FDCPA:
- Add-On Collection Fees
- Attorney's Fees
- Class Actions
- Collector Licensing
- Contacting Represented Consumers
- Default Judgments
- Definition of Debts
- Discovery Orders
- g Validation Notice
- Miscellaneous Cases
- Rooker-Feldman Doctrine
- State Law Interplay

-

Standing
- Student Loans
- Summary Judgment/Motions to Dismiss
  Invasion of Privacy
  Breach of Peace
  Class Actions


















 



 

 

FDCPA: Attorney's Fees (NEW)

  • Newman v. The Cadle Company. - Hawaii District Court File 01-00539 (ACK/LEK) - November 24, 2003 - $26,301.92 in attorneys fees and $884.03 in taxable costs awarded NACA Attorney Norman K.K. Lau.

  • Armstrong v. Rose Law Firm, P.A. - Court File 00-2287 (MJD/SRN) - 2002 WL 31050583 - $44,655.29 in fees and costs awarded to our firm and the Consumer Justice Center, P.A.  “The Court finds the rate of $250 per hour ordinary and reasonable for prosecuting FDCPA cases in this community.  … The Court finds that Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs [of  $44,655.29] are reasonably proportional.  While they far exceed the [$1,000] statutory damages award in the present case, Plaintiff did not choose to create this disparity.  Defendant aggressively defended this case, as was its right. … This defense produced a large amount of litigation, and significantly increased the number of hours Plaintiff’s attorney committed to this case.”

  • Sonmore v. Checkrite - FEE ORDER - USDC Minn. - CV-99-2039 DDA-FLN - District Court awards $82,000.00 in attorney's fees and $16,326.97 in costs in an FDCPA case with $4,000.00 in statutory damages.  Plaintiff's counsel had sought an attorney fee and cost award of more than $190,000.

  • Gonzalez v. Barnhart - Civil No. 01-499 JRT/FLN (August 9, 2002) - An excellent analysis of the legal basis for statutory attorney's fee awards.  District Court awards $5,000 in attorneys fees in social security case.  Case quote: "Little evidence is offered to support defendant’s assertions beyond stating that the amount plaintiff has billed 'seems excessive given the routine nature' of the documents prepared and reviewed. The Court is not persuaded by this assertion. Plaintiff’s counsel billed one-half hour each for activities such as writing letters to the client and reviewing motions. These activities are necessary and important aspects of counsel’s representation of plaintiff that required plaintiff’s counsel to bill some time for them. The expenditure of one-half hour for each of these activities is not unreasonable."

 

 

Click here for FDCPA Boot Camp Brochure

Pete Barry has been asked to speak at the Oct. 2008 National Consumer Law Conference in Portland Oregon.

Pete Barry was appeared on Fox News Los Angeles for a story on abusive debt collection.

Pete Barry will speak to the National Association of Consumer Advocates and the NCLC FDCPA Conference on March 28, 2008.

 

 

Pete Barry will speak to the Volunteer Attorneys Program in Duluth, Minnesota on October 19, 2007, on the topic of abusive collection practices.

 

 

 

 

 

Pete Barry featured on ABC's 20/20 & Nightline for a story about abusive debt collection practices. Click here to see the segment in QuickTime format from January 19, 2007. (Watch the whole story here.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pete Barry will speak at the Minnesota State Bar Association's "Military Legal Assistance Seminar"
on September 11, 2007 in Minneapolis.

 

 

 

 

 

Pete Barry will speak July 13, 2007 at the University of Gonzaga Law School in Spokane, Washington.







 

  Search Lawpoint.com Search WWW


Please Read Our Privacy Policy

Send Feedback with questions or comments about this web site to Peter F. Barry, Attorney at Law, Admitted in Minnesota. 
All Content Copyright © 1994-2006 Barry & Slade, LLC. All other Trademarks are property of their respective holders.

Site Developed and Hosted by CTS Internet of Minnesota